5 comments

  • ben_w 3 hours ago
    Assuming he was ever sincere about how he'd "like to die on Mars, just not on impact", the SpaceX development cycle is to throw lots of cheap hardware at the problem to find problems quickly. "Quickly" isn't possible when the launch windows only come every two years. (Short journey times and always-open launch windows for returns are among the reasons that, if I had his wealth and influence, I'd have always gone for the Moon over Mars).

    Bluntly though, the lack of any visible progress with SpaceX-branded Sabatier machines already had me suspicious.

  • beardyw 2 hours ago
    Also in the news A A Milne pivots from Christopher Robin to Winnie the Pooh.
  • Guestmodinfo 2 hours ago
    Keep changing the goalpost; be constantly in the news; mint billions. Good strategy
  • JPLeRouzic 2 hours ago
    I feel it's time to seriously consider research on something else than chemical rockets for space exploration.
    • ben_w 2 hours ago
      If I was a dictator in charge of a tens-of-trillions of dollar-equivalent economy, I'd do that.

      Unfortunately, I really do mean "dictator" as we'd need to sustain a lot of R&D for a long time (much longer than a two-term US president for example), and even nations can't afford to spend a huge percentage of their economy on long-term projects so it has to be a fairly limited % of the overall money supply for that period. And one needs to be extremely cautious, no speed-running: a nation cannot afford to have a thematic repeat of the Apollo 1 fire with e.g. a 2000 km long Lofstrom launch loop: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Launch_loop

      There's three options for that size of economy:

      • The US space industry comes in two parts, (1) a jobs program ("Senate Launch System" etc.) whose stated goals change with almost every new president, and (2) New Space (where Musk got the lion's share, but now he showed what is possible the whole world is quite capable of following the same path). Neither half of this lends itself to an R&D program on this scale.

      • The EU is not one nation, it's a glorified free trade area. The EU's budget independently of the member states is nowhere near big enough to consider this.

      • That leaves China; they could, I think, if they decide they want to. Will they decide that? I have no idea. Fits belt-and-road, but they may consider it a pointless boondoggle.

    • mytailorisrich 2 hours ago
      I don't think this is the main issue here.

      To live on Mars requires a level of autonomy and self-sufficiency that I don't think we know how to do.

      On the Moon we can learn but we have softer requirements, and we can still have near real time comms. Anything further and it's "you're alone, no-one can help you, no-one will even hear you in case of emergency". Faster transportation isn't going to fundamentally change that unless it's near Star Trek level.

      IMHO, the rocket is just a small part of the problem.

  • adyashakti 3 hours ago
    why would he give up on FSD? they're both impossible problems with today's tech. maybe it was deliberate overreach, maybe hubris; maybe some of both.